End Citizen United Explains the Effects of Foreign Intervention in U.S Election

End Citizen United is a political committee that has a mission of terminating the use of large sums of money in politics and solve the manipulated political structure by holding many reform campaigns in the finance, developing and authorizing national ballot measures and raising the problem in the national dialogue. End Citizen United has also collaborated with other organizations to overturn Citizen United and terminate the unlimited and secret usage of money in the United States politics. To accomplish that mission, End Citizen United will appoint candidates that support reforms, will raise the matter of using foreign money in politics to a critical national issue and involving the ordinary members to show how money influences the politics. The political committee also has a role of enlightening the public about the matter.

In the recent past, End Citizen United learned that a Russian company that is related to Kremlin bought ads that had a purpose of manipulating the previous presidential election. As a result of this issue, End Citizen United recognized that the United States elections laws were not functioning well since it is an offense to spend foreign money on political campaigns.

Robert Mueller who is a special counsel, has been mandated by the committee to investigate whether Donald Trump involved the Russians in manipulating the 2016 elections. The committee believes that Robert will get deep into the matter and come up with proper findings. The only thing that is worrying the board is whether Washington will be ready to end foreign influence in the United States election in future.

It is not only the foreign governments that take advantage of the feeble election laws but also prominent organizations or wealthy individuals can influence the US politics. For instance, a Chinese company donated 1.3 million dollars to Super PAC. Similarly, a wealthy Mexican businessman funded the Super PAC with vast sums of money. Even though the committee is conscious of the foreign entities that were involved in the previous campaigns, it speculates that more unrecognized external organizations and individuals could have participated in altering the outcomes of the election. The committee also thinks that there is a possibility that foreign governments could have spent ten million dollars to manipulate the polls.

End Citizen United believes that all those foreign donations are just beginning with many subsequent contributions in the proceeding elections. They also think that the government has the necessary solutions to the issue but lacks the will to solve it. Learn more:https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/end-citizens-united

 

How Citizens United is planning to Protect the Johnson Amendment

The country has learned a lot of lessons from the election that has just been concluded. One of the most important lessons that everyone ought to take away from the process is the fact that there was too much interference from outside forces, and this could have had a direct influence on the outcome. People have been suspecting that the Russians interfered with the electoral process, and new evidence has emerged linking other groups to the process. The End Citizens United is a PAC which feels that it is time to make changes to the laws that govern the electoral process.

The group was initially put in place to help organize fundraising efforts for various Democratic Party Candidates. They helped raise funds, which put several of their preferred contestants in office. The other issue that has been disturbing them, however, is the illegal entrance of big corporates in the electoral process and the fact that it is possible for these groups to offer any amount of money to the candidates running. They feel that this creates leaders who are easy to manipulate, which is not good for the proper governance of a country. They want to have the Johnson Amendment protected from changes that would undermine the Democracy that we have been fighting for in the past few centuries.

The Johnson’s amendment was put in place to prohibit organizations such as churches from taking part in the electoral process. The government is looking for loopholes that they can use to weaken the amendment and create a situation where the churches can be used by politicians to further their agenda and acquire financial assistance. The primary task of the End Citizens United here is to make sure that the bill, which the president is already set to sign into law, does not become law. The leader of the End Citizens United says that any amendment which brings churches on board as interested partners in the electoral process will always be counter-productive because they might turn churches into tools which can be used by anyone in the process of trying to get into office.

The CEO of the Group, Tiffany Muller says that there is a reason behind the introduction of the Johnson Amendment, which was done in 1954. She adds that it is upon all the citizens of the country to think about the chaos that the national political scene will become when churches and schools become partisan in the electoral process. The law states that churches and schools can lose their tax exemption if they are found to be taking part in such political activities. The End Citizens United is here to ensure that the rule of law is respected.

Read more on wikipedia.org to know more about End Citizens United.

 

End Citizens America has vowed to protect the Johnson Amendment

When Texas Senator Lyndon B. Johnson introduced his amendment to the United States Constitution in 1954, it did not attract much attention in the media or raise eyebrows in the political circles. It seemed to all as a reasonable amendment that reinforced a basic American principle which envisioned a country where the church and the state operated independent of each other. In fact, the amendment was made into law that very year and was signed into law by a Republican president Dwight Eisenhower. However, as the years have progressed and the effects of the amendment have come to be felt in the political arena, it has become a bone of contention.

The Republican Party, ironically, has been actively attempting to repeal or weaken the Johnson Amendment over the years. Many Republican politicians have spoken against it on different occasions, key among them President Donald Trump. In fact, a repeal of this amendment was one of his key campaign promises during his presidential campaign in 2016. And now that he is president, Republican Party legislators have been making attempts to either weaken the amendment or repeal it altogether.

There is a reason why politicians would wish to do away with the Johnson Amendment. Mainly its because it prohibits tax-exempt non-profit organizations such as charities, universities, and churches from campaigning for or against a political candidate. These organizations and institutions, referred to as 501(c)(3), would lose their tax-exempt status if they were to violate this amendment. Politicians are more concerned with the inability of the church to participate in political discourse than any other organization. There are two main reasons for this. Firstly, the church is a very influential institution which bears the ability to steer its congregants’ political persuasion, making it the most powerful political tool which cannot be used. Watch youtube to know more.

The second one is the money. Americans contribute billions of dollars to the church each year, with the belief that they would be used for good courses both in the country and around the world. Repealing the Johnson Amendment would allow the churches to spend such money for political campaigns. However, the main concern is that doing this would open a loophole for the wealthy to channel their campaign contributions through the churches. This would create an avenue for dark money to find its way into political campaigns.

That is why End Citizens America has started a campaign to save the Johnson Amendment. End Citizens America is a PAC which was established in 2010 with the aim of preventing dark money from entering into political campaigns. This was after the Supreme Court of United States, adjudicating the Citizens United v. FEC case, determined that corporate bodies bore the same rights as individuals, a decision which allowed such bodies to contribute money to political campaigns anonymously. This made it difficult to prevent dark money from entering the American political process.

End Citizens America views the recent attempts at weakening or repealing the Johnson Amendment as another affront to American democracy which would create another avenue for dark money to enter in the political campaigns. Know more: https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00573261/

 

How James Bopp Conceived The Birth Of End Citizens United

James Bopp, a lawyer from Terre Haute, Indiana, got laughed at when he appeared before a court in Washington, DC, to defend his client, Citizens United to air a movie named Hillary. Bopp wanted the movie to be played during Democrat presidential primaries. In the film, Hillary was portrayed as a ruthless political schemer and a European socialist. Kathleen Willey who also featured in the movie accused Bill Clinton of kissing and hugging her while in White House. She also accused the president of plotting to assassinate her cat.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) denied Citizens United rights to air the film. Judge Royce Lamberth laughed loudly saying that a Hillary, a 90-minute movie couldn’t be compared with other 60 minute movies. Two years later, the Supreme Court reversed Lamberth ruling adopting James Bopp’s arguments. The Supreme Court stated that corporations just like average voters have First Amendment rights. Today, James Bopp is struggling to dismantle all campaign regulations. Many reformers have described James Bopp as an opportunist who uses his clients to broaden the loopholes in the law to benefit wealthy politicians and organizations.

End Citizens United Plan to Raise $35 Million

End Citizens United, a political action committee devoted to driving away big and dirty money out of campaigns in the United States has raised $ 4million within the first three months of 2017 and has plans to have over $35 million by next year’s midterm elections. The super PAC raised $25 million in last year’s presidential elections. If the amount raised last year had a significant influence n the campaigns, $35 million would have a bigger impact in this 2018 midterms.

In the first quarter of 2017, over 100,000 contributed to the PAC. Of this number, 40,000 of them were new to donors. The average contribution is $12, and Tiffany Muller, the president of the PAC, believes that the reason behind the high number of contributors is that they feel that the system has always rigged them out. Muller also said that the Democrats are furious with President Trump win and are ready to fight back. Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch has also angered the Democrats.

During the congressional campaign for Jon Ossof in Georgia, the PAC was surprised by its contributors when they requested them to raise $500,000 towards Ossoff campaigns. The contributors raised $4million. Muller suggested that the group is still evaluating the different candidates, but the group could endorse Sherrod Brown, Ohio senator and Jon Tester of Montana.

End Citizens United was formed with the aim of repealing the 2010 Supreme Court ruling that introduced big and dirty money in the country’s campaigns. The End Citizens United cannot accept more than $5,000 from a single contributor. Despite the contribution cap, the PAC raised significant money that aided Hillary Clinton in her campaigns.